16 research outputs found

    Implicit szekvencia tanulás : inter-stimulus intervallum és szubjektív élmény

    Get PDF
    Ebben a kutatásban az implicit szekvencia tanulás kapcsán a konstans interstimulus intervallum (ISI; 770 ms) és a standard, konstans válasz-stimulus intervallum (RSI; 170 ms) használatának különbségét vizsgáltuk az alternáló szeriális reakcióidő (ASRT) feladatban (Howard & Howard, 1997). Emellett a résztvevők háromféle szubjektív élményét is vizsgáltuk a feladat során (hat alkalommal) egy-egy rövid kérdéssel: az unalmat, a feszültséget, és azt, hogy inkább pontosságra vagy inkább gyorsaságra fókuszálnak. Konstans válaszstimulus intervallum esetén rövidebbek voltak az inter-stimulus intervallumok, gyorsabbak voltak az ingerekre adott válaszok, pontosságban és tanulásban nem jelent meg különbség. Konstans inter-stimulus intervallum esetén korrelációt találtunk a tanulás és pontosság között, konstans válasz-stimulus intervallum esetén ez nem jelent meg. A résztvevők idővel egyre inkább unták a feladatot, a feszültség nem változott, de egyre inkább a gyorsaságra koncentráltak – ez utóbbi tendencia jelentősen mérséklődött konstans inter-stimulus intervallum esetében; ezen tényezőkkel más szignifikáns eltérést nem találtunk konstans válasz-stimulus intervallum és konstans inter-stimulus intervallum között. Konstans válasz-stimulus intervallum esetén az unalom és tanulás közt negatív korrelációt találtunk, amíg ez konstans inter-stimulus intervallum esetén nem jelent meg. Egyéb szignifikáns korrelációt a tanulás és az egyes szubjektív tényezők közt nem találtunk

    Characterization of community structure of culturable endophytic fungi in sweet cherry composite trees and their growth-retarding effect against pathogens

    Get PDF
    Endophytic fungi have the potential to protect their host plants in stress situations. Characterizing the ecology and complex interaction between these endophytes and their host plants is therefore of great practical importance, particularly in horticultural plants. Among horticultural plants, fruit trees form a special category because of their longevity and because they are composites of rootstock and scion, which often belong to different plant species. Here we present the first characterization of culturable endophytic fungal community of sweet cherry. Samples from the Hungarian cultivar ‘Petrus’ grafted on 11 different rootstocks were collected in autumn and in spring in a bearing orchard and the dependence of colonization rate and endophyte diversity on rootstock, organ and season was analysed. On the basis of their ITS sequences 26 fungal operational taxonomic units were identified at least down to the genus level. The dominant genus, comprising more than 50% of all isolates, was Alternaria, followed by different Fusarium and Epicoccum species. We observed some organ-specificity amongst endophytes, and organs showed more sizeable differences in colonization rates and endophyte diversity than rootstocks. Most dynamic endophyte populations, strongly influenced by environmental conditions and crop management, were observed in leaves. The potential of selected endophytes to confer protection against Monilinia laxa was also analysed and 7 isolates were found to inhibit the growth of this pathogen in vitro

    The first independent study on the complex trial protocol version of the P300-based concealed information test: Corroboration of previous findings and highlights on vulnerabilities

    Get PDF
    More than a dozen studies of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of the P300-based Concealed Information Test have been published since its introduction (Rosenfeld et al., 2008), and it has been fairly consistently proven to provide high accuracy and strong resistance to countermeasures (Rosenfeld et al., 2013). However, no independent authors have verified these findings until now. In the present, first independent study, we corroborate the accuracy and countermeasure-resistance of the CTP, when the probe item (critical presented information, e.g., crime detail; P) vs. all irrelevant items (Iall) comparison is used for classifying participants as guilty or innocent, but we also show that the CTP is severely vulnerable to countermeasures, when the P vs. the irrelevant item with the largest P300 responses (Imax) comparison is used. This latter measure can be defeated by creating “oddball” items among the irrelevant items (through targeting them with covert responses), and thereby making their P300 responses statistically indistinguishable from those of the probe item. Practical implications are discussed

    Dispersion matters: Diagnostics and control data computer simulation in Concealed Information Test studies.

    No full text
    Binary classification has numerous applications. For one, lie detection methods typically aim to classify each tested person either as "liar" or as "truthteller" based on the given test results. To infer practical implications, as well as to compare different methods, it is essential to assess the diagnostic efficiency, such as demonstrating the number of correctly classified persons. However, this is not always straightforward. In Concealed Information Tests (CITs), the key predictor value (probe-irrelevant difference) for "truthtellers" is always similar (zero on average), and "liars" are always distinguished by a larger value (i.e., a larger number resulting from the CIT test, as compared to the zero baseline). Thereby, in general, the larger predictor values a given CIT method obtains for "liars" on average, the better this method is assumed to be. This has indeed been assumed in countless studies, and therefore, when comparing the classification efficiencies of two different designs, the mean difference of "liar" predictor values in the two designs were simply compared to each other (hence not collecting "truthteller" data to spare resources). We show, based on the meta-data of 12 different experimental designs collected in response time-based CIT studies, that differences in dispersion (i.e., variance in the data, e.g. the extent of random deviations from the zero average in case of "truthtellers") can substantially influence classification efficiency-to the point that, in extreme cases, one design may even be superior in classification despite having a larger mean "liar" predictor value. However, we also introduce a computer simulation procedure to estimate classification efficiency in the absence of "truthteller" data, and validate this procedure via a meta-analysis comparing outcomes based on empirical data versus simulated data

    Response Time Concealed Information Test on smartphones

    Get PDF
    The Response Time-Based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) can reveal when a person recognizes a relevant (probe) item among other, irrelevant items, based on comparatively slower responding to the probe item. Thereby, if a person is concealing the knowledge about the relevance of this item (e.g., recognizing it as a murder weapon), this deception can be revealed. So far, the RT-CIT has been used only on desktop computers. In Experiment 1 (n = 72; within-subject), we compare the probe-irrelevant differences when using the conventional desktop-based CIT to using a smartphone-based CIT, demonstrating practical equivalence. In Experiment 2 (n = 116; within-subject), we demonstrate that using thumbs for responses (while holding the smartphone) leads to equally efficient CIT results as using conventional index finger responses. At the same time, this second experiment also demonstrates how smartphone-based studies may be efficiently run in large groups, using the participants’ own smartphones. Finally, as an interesting addition, here for the first time we also measured keypress durations (i.e., the time durations of holding down the response keys) in the RT-CIT, which we found to be significantly shorter for probe than for irrelevant items

    The first independent study on the complex trial protocol version of the P300-based concealed information test : Corroboration of previous findings and highlights on vulnerabilities

    No full text
    Abstract More than a dozen studies of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of the P300-based Concealed Information Test have been published since its introduction (Rosenfeld et al., 2008), and it has been fairly consistently proven to provide high accuracy and strong resistance to countermeasures (Rosenfeld et al., 2013). However, no independent authors have verified these findings until now. In the present, first independent study, we corroborate the accuracy and countermeasure-resistance of the CTP, when the probe item (critical presented information, e.g., crime detail; P) vs. all irrelevant items (Iall) comparison is used for classifying participants as guilty or innocent, but we also show that the CTP is severely vulnerable to countermeasures, when the P vs. the irrelevant item with the largest P300 responses (Imax) comparison is used. This latter measure can be defeated by creating “oddball” items among the irrelevant items (through targeting them with covert responses), and thereby making their P300 responses statistically indistinguishable from those of the probe item. Practical implications are discussed
    corecore